FAQs

We answer your questions about WATCH’s call for a generous end to the 2014 House of Bishops’ Declaration…

  • This is something that women have been asked on many occasions in the past as we have struggled to be treated equally with men. There is always something else that is deemed more important.

    Women make up half of the population and two thirds of our congregations. Making us feel second-class and restricting our God-given ministries has a high price both on women ourselves and on the mission of the Church. Ordained women tend to put up with the situation, because they have no other choice, but lay people – when they become aware of the inequality for women in the Church – are dismayed by it and find it unacceptable. The way that the Church discriminates against women and other groups is a reason often cited by people when asked why they have stopped going to Church or are not interested in attending Church.

Do the arrangements actually cause anyone any harm?

Being on the receiving end of discrimination is harmful, whether or not we accept it. It diminishes and degrades us, often in a slow and steady process. At a NADAWM (National Deans of Women’s Ministry) conference recently, someone described the wounding that women experience discrimination in the Church a bit like how a bed sore develops – with one tiny abrasion adding to another until it is a really painful sore.  Dr Gabriella Thomas in her research, For the Good of the Church, comes to a similar conclusion – referring to mutual flourishing, as experienced by Anglican women, as ‘an open wound’ in the Church.

When we look at mental health statistics, we see that all groups that experience discrimination, whether by sex, sexuality, race, class or disability, typically have poorer mental health than white able-bodied heterosexual middleclass men.

  • Ordained women face the most obvious and direct discrimination. Doctoral Researcher at the University of Birmingham, Sarah Schofield, has conducted recent research (comprising interviews with a range of ordained women in the Church of England), that evidences the discrimination that ordained women experience and its impact.  One of her interviewees says, ‘To be in an institution which has said that it is alright for people to hold office who have the view that women are not able to be priests is for me to be in an institution which appears completely half-hearted in its support for my ministry and for the ministry of other women.’ Bishop Rose Hudson-Wilkin has spoken of the daily humiliation that the arrangements bring. Being expected to attend events where you are not allowed to preach or preside over communion and yet are expected to smile and say this is acceptable.

    Rev Jeremy Clines, Chaplain at Sheffield University, speaks about the moral injury that is caused to ordained women when they are expected to be silent about the injustice that they experience and yet represent a Church that is called to proclaim a gospel of justice for all people.

    Ordained women are forced to keep their concerns and experiences of discrimination to themselves. To speak out means that they are labelled as difficult and will preclude them getting promotions in the Church. I myself, for example, have been told that I am blacklisted from getting any form of promotion because I have spoken out publicly about discrimination against women in the Church. I know Deans of Women’s ministry who have been advised to resign their membership of WATCH if they want to continue in their positions. All this means that not only are women experiencing costly discrimination and diminishment, but also they are coerced into silence about this.

    The discrimination that ordained women experience means that there are certain parishes where they cannot apply for posts. And, in the case of bishops, there are parishes for whom female bishops need to make arrangements for extended oversight by an acceptable male bishop.

    But, perhaps more importantly, this institutional discrimination legitimises all kinds of sexism. And although we have a good percentage of priests and bishops who are now female, the top jobs are still largely given to men. Statistics show that, as a female priest, you are more likely to be serving in rural ministry looking after seven or more parishes with no support, while male priests occupy almost all of the senior posts at large city churches with big staff teams. Furthermore, about 25% of bishops are now female, but only eight out of 42 Diocesan Bishops are female. This is because the system of appointment through the CNC is skewed against female candidates who effectively need to get 10 out of 10 possible votes rather than 10 out of 14.  As a result, only three in the last thirteen appointments of Diocesans have been women.

  • Most lay women and men are unaware of the ongoing discrimination against women in the Church. There is a deliberate policy of covering up and disguising the current arrangements. Despite WATCH, the SCM and others calling for transparency, almost nothing has been done to make it easy for lay people to see whether their church puts any limits on women’s ministries. And this is deliberate because churches who limit women’s ministries know that to explain this clearly would be problematic from a missional perspective. So, either nothing is said or wording is cloaked in jargon so that people cannot understand it. When people do find out that their church has a policy of limiting women’s ministries (usually when a vacancy arises), they are frequently upset about this.  They may feel betrayed and almost defrauded, especially if they have been members of the church for a long time and have given sacrificially with their own ministries and their money.

    A lay woman may also be in a church which limits women’s ministry and find that, if she has a vocation to ordained ministry, then this is either unrecognised or discouraged. All priests are supposed to pass on potential female candidates for ordination to other priests to help them in the discernment process, if they cannot themselves. Nonetheless, this does not always happen, and sometimes a woman does not recognise her calling herself when she sees no women leading, preaching or presiding in the church she attends.

    As an ADO myself in recent years, I have observed how some vicars will give men in their congregations, who are discerning a calling, opportunities like preaching or leading a small group to help them explore their calling.  But deny the same opportunities to women who have also told them they are discerning a calling. All this makes it harder for a woman to get a true sense of whether she is being called to ministry or not.

    Women have been treated as second-class in the Church for many, many years and have been constrained to lowly positions. Their gifts have often not been recognised. Continuing with arrangements that still put women in a special category where they may or may not be accepted and their gifts may or may not be fully received by the Church, is to continue to diminish women who are equally made in the image of God as men are. Dr Sharon Jagger, senior lecturer in religion at York St John University, has done some recent research with lay women in the Church of England which she has published in a report called Rock the Boat and gives evidence of the impact of discrimination on lay women in the Church today.

  • Our children and young people are being taught, in some churches, theology that is frankly bad and potentially harmful. There is a clear and proven correlation between understandings of male privilege and violence against women and girls. (See almost anything written by Kevin Giles on this subject.) 

    I was in a Church of England school last year and taking a class of sixth formers and one young man put up his hand and said that his church taught that women need to be under the authority of men.  This was a difficult thing to hear with half the class being 16-year-old girls. I was personally, of course, in a position to rebut the interpretations of scripture that he had been taught, but they were not. One girl rather meekly said, but isn’t it Eve’s fault as she ate the apple first?

    We have to take seriously the theology that our children are being taught. Just because we call something theology does not make it good. Some theology is bad. With hindsight, we can easily look at the theologies that underpinned apartheid in South Africa or the Ku Klux Klan in the US and say this was bad theology – but we need to recognise it in our own midst. And I (and many practical theologians like Leah Robinson, for example) would say that a clear red flag when it comes to discerning if theology is good or bad is whether it actually harms people.

    There is a lot of domestic violence in our culture and most of it is directed at women and girls and is often justified by an understanding that women need to do what men tell them. I would have liked to have said to the young people in that classroom that, in the Church of England, we treat women and men equally and we believe that this is what Christ calls to do. Full stop. Sadly, I was unable to do this.  I could not even say that the Church is working towards greater gender justice because it isn’t. We have (thankfully) a Church of England Head of Racial Justice but no Head of Gender Justice.

    A lay woman may also be in a church which limits women’s ministry and find that, if she has a vocation to ordained ministry, then this is either unrecognised or discouraged. All priests are supposed to pass on potential female candidates for ordination to other priests to help them in the discernment process, if they cannot themselves. Nonetheless, this does not always happen, and sometimes a woman does not recognise her calling herself when she sees no women leading, preaching or presiding in the church she attends.

    As an ADO myself in recent years, I have observed how some vicars will give men in their congregations, who are discerning a calling, opportunities like preaching or leading a small group to help them explore their calling.  But deny the same opportunities to women who have also told them they are discerning a calling. All this makes it harder for a woman to get a true sense of whether she is being called to ministry or not.

    Women have been treated as second-class in the Church for many, many years and have been constrained to lowly positions. Their gifts have often not been recognised. Continuing with arrangements that still put women in a special category where they may or may not be accepted and their gifts may or may not be fully received by the Church, is to continue to diminish women who are equally made in the image of God as men are. Dr Sharon Jagger, senior lecturer in religion at York St John University, has done some recent research with lay women in the Church of England which she has published in a report called Rock the Boat and gives evidence of the impact of discrimination on lay women in the Church today.

  • The injustice and violence that women and girls experience around our world is caused, perpetuated and justified, in many instances, by an understanding that women should do what men tell them to do and, if they don’t, they should be punished.  The practices of these oppressive cultures are often underpinned and justified by theology – whether Christian, Muslim or of other faiths. Correcting this bad theology is really important. And it is hard for us to do this with any authenticity if we ourselves, as a Church, still discriminate against women.I was in a Church of England school last year and taking a class of sixth formers and one young man put up his hand and said that his church taught that women need to be under the authority of men.  This was a difficult thing to hear with half the class being 16-year-old girls. I was personally, of course, in a position to rebut the interpretations of scripture that he had been taught, but they were not. One girl rather meekly said, but isn’t it Eve’s fault as she ate the apple first?

    We have to take seriously the theology that our children are being taught. Just because we call something theology does not make it good. Some theology is bad. With hindsight, we can easily look at the theologies that underpinned apartheid in South Africa or the Ku Klux Klan in the US and say this was bad theology – but we need to recognise it in our own midst. And I (and many practical theologians like Leah Robinson, for example) would say that a clear red flag when it comes to discerning if theology is good or bad is whether it actually harms people.

    There is a lot of domestic violence in our culture and most of it is directed at women and girls and is often justified by an understanding that women need to do what men tell them. I would have liked to have said to the young people in that classroom that, in the Church of England, we treat women and men equally and we believe that this is what Christ calls to do. Full stop. Sadly, I was unable to do this.  I could not even say that the Church is working towards greater gender justice because it isn’t. We have (thankfully) a Church of England Head of Racial Justice but no Head of Gender Justice.

    A lay woman may also be in a church which limits women’s ministry and find that, if she has a vocation to ordained ministry, then this is either unrecognised or discouraged. All priests are supposed to pass on potential female candidates for ordination to other priests to help them in the discernment process, if they cannot themselves. Nonetheless, this does not always happen, and sometimes a woman does not recognise her calling herself when she sees no women leading, preaching or presiding in the church she attends.

    As an ADO myself in recent years, I have observed how some vicars will give men in their congregations, who are discerning a calling, opportunities like preaching or leading a small group to help them explore their calling.  But deny the same opportunities to women who have also told them they are discerning a calling. All this makes it harder for a woman to get a true sense of whether she is being called to ministry or not.

    Women have been treated as second-class in the Church for many, many years and have been constrained to lowly positions. Their gifts have often not been recognised. Continuing with arrangements that still put women in a special category where they may or may not be accepted and their gifts may or may not be fully received by the Church, is to continue to diminish women who are equally made in the image of God as men are. Dr Sharon Jagger, senior lecturer in religion at York St John University, has done some recent research with lay women in the Church of England which she has published in a report called Rock the Boat and gives evidence of the impact of discrimination on lay women in the Church today.

  • Before addressing this question, it is important to point out the work of social scientists, like Dr Alex D J Fry of Bournemouth University, who show that so-called theological conscience, of those in the Church of England who seek to limit women’s ministries, is mostly from social factors – that is, it is indistinguishable from what we understand as prejudice. Furthermore, Fry has done some interesting work on how the arguments that those who seek to limit women’s ministries use map onto what sociologists call System Justification Theory. That is to say that people who enjoy privilege often seek arguments that will preserve that privilege. And that is what appears to be happening in the Church.

    Bringing the 2014 arrangements to an end would mean that we put an end to discrimination institutionally. It would not mean that anyone needs to be evicted from the Church. No one would be forced to receive communion from a female priest if they did not want to. People who did not want to receive preaching or teaching from women could seek out churches with exclusively male leadership. So, there would be the ability to continue as individuals to believe that women’s ministries should be restricted – but the Church would not see this as theology that it condoned as an institution.

    The Church of England is a broad church which is a good thing, but even the broadest churches have walls. We do not, for example, allow those who believe God created one race to be superior to another to teach that ‘theology’ in our Church, and quite rightly.

    Every other Anglican province which has allowed women to be priests and bishops has managed to create a culture in which theological difference of opinion on the ordination of women is accepted as a reality but is not enshrined in law. The Church of England is the only Anglican province that has female priests and bishops and has legislation that says it is acceptable to not accept them and those who don’t accept them should flourish.  As you can imagine, these provinces had a good number of male priests who did not welcome female priests but those male priests have neither left in substantial numbers nor do they feel unwelcome in their churches.

    Furthermore, as we continue to worry that there may be a small number of people who say they cannot stay in the Church of England if we bring the 2014 arrangements to an end, we seem to take no account of the many people who cannot join the Church of England or have left it because of its discrimination against women..

  • Admitting to discrimination and using exemptions that the Church of England has under the Equality Act 2010 to administer this discrimination is publicly embarrassing, so the Church goes out of its way to cover all this up.  Many senior clergy are completely against raising awareness about the arrangements, whatever they may say. Bishops have made it a requirement for church websites to make a statement about safeguarding on their homepage and they could do the same about churches’ positions on women’s ministry. But we have been told that discrimination by sex is a ‘secondary issue’ and not something that churches should be required to be transparent about.

    People who have recently been ordained say that they received hardly any information about the Declaration and the background to women’s ministry in the Church when they did their theological training. They say they were required to sign to say that they accepted the 5 Guiding Principles and the Declaration and ADOs often would tell them not to worry about it, if they had any concerns, but just to sign because they have to – otherwise they would not be allowed to train for ministry. Many women and men say that they had concerns about the arrangements but were told they had no choice if they wanted to continue with their calling.

  • Allowing churches to choose their own bishops to have matching theology on women’s ministry was never a good idea and effectively caused a split – so that now we are no longer in full communion with each other.

    We used to have a Church where a bishop was a bishop. You almost certainly would not agree with your bishop on every theological matter but nonetheless he was your Bishop and you just had to get on with that. In the past, we have had bishops who have said that they don’t even believe in the resurrection but no one had the right to have extended oversight from another bishop who did believe in the resurrection.

    Scandalously, it is only over the matter of the ordination of women, that churches have the right to seek oversight from a bishop who concurs with them theologically on this matter. (And incidentally the cost of four PEV bishops was £497,000pa plus housing costs in 2024.)  If we have some similar arrangement for people who want to insist that their bishop agrees with them theologically on LLF matters, we will split the Church further.

  • In 1992 General Synod voted by two thirds majorities in each House for women to be allowed to be priests, full stop.  The following year the House of Bishops introduced the Act of Synod which allowed those who did not accept female priests ‘protection’ - so that they could exclude them and discriminate on grounds of sex.  The same Synod voted this through in perhaps the biggest and fastest going back on their word of all time.  The Declaration is effectively Act of Synod 2.0.

    Women have tried to live with the Act of Synod and Declaration for over thirty years with the hope that, seeing the genuine calling and hard work of women’s ministry, discrimination would come to an end.  That is not happening.  Those who don’t fully accept women’s ministry interpret their right to flourish to include the right to be Diocesan bishops (overseeing female clergy), to have their own theological college (a new one has just been opened in Lancashire for Traditionalist Anglo-Catholic ordinands with funding from the CofE), to have separate Chrism masses, separate ordination services and restrictions on who can lay hands on people during the consecration of bishops.

    There are many aspects of the Declaration that are being abused and there is no policing of it by the Church.  It is time to bring it to an end and afford women the dignity and protection of equality.

  • It will not be easy to bring the Declaration to an end and it will require majorities in all three houses of two thirds. Nonetheless, simply bringing the situation back to Synod will greatly increase awareness of the issues and most people up and down the country very much would like to get rid of discrimination by sex in the Church. It was interesting to see in The Times survey last year that 67% of the 1,500 clergy who were interviewed said that it was time for the arrangements to come to an end.

For an explanation of terms, please head to our Glossary page